http://theage.com.au/articles/2004/07/26/1090693897021.html
Minister
calls for students' progress to be ranked
By
Jason Koutsoukis, Orietta Guerrera
Canberra
July
27, 2004
Federal Education Minister Brendan Nelson wants to force government schools to issue reports ranking students against their classmates and against national academic standards.
The
plan for more detailed reports on students has emerged among a host of
conditions that government schools will have to satisfy to qualify for their
federal funding.
Dr
Nelson says most state school reports are "full of nonsense" and tell parents
nothing about the progress of their children. Campaigning in marginal seats in
Victoria this week, Dr Nelson called on Labor to pass the federal funding
legislation that is listed for debate in the House of Representatives next
week.
"I
have been sent hundreds of these reports which are totally meaningless," Dr
Nelson told The
Age.
"We've
got reports where the teachers tick a box 'A', for achieving, or 'AA', almost
achieving, but what does that mean?"
"The
basic intention of school reports these days is to not give any offence at all
to either the parent or the child, but parents have had enough and are getting
quite angry about it."
If
the legislation is passed, from 2005 schools will be required, as a condition of
government funding, to report to parents of students in years 3, 5 and 7 on
children's performances against national literacy and numeracy
standards.
School
reports will also have to abide by broadly stated principles that ensure parents
receive timely, plain-language feedback on their child's performance, with
students ranked at least according to what quarter of the class they fall into
in a particular subject.
"If
my son is in the bottom 25 per cent of the class then I want to know about it,"
Dr Nelson said.
"Someone
has to be in the bottom 25 per cent, and if they are there, then they have a
problem and that needs to be addressed."
Dr
Nelson said community feedback to him on his ideas about school reports had been
overwhelming.
"This
notion that all children are the same, and progress at the same rate and are
assessed in exactly the same way, and that some children do not fail to meet
basic benchmarks is a complete and total nonsense to which parents have had
enough," he said.
"Most
parents are working and living in the real world on Planet Common Sense and they
want information reported to them about their children's educational
progress."
Labor
says it is committed to providing parents with comprehensive report cards, but
it has yet to release its schools policy.
Opposition
education spokeswoman Jenny Macklin said school reports should show whether
students were improving and acknowledged that parents wanted to know how their
children compared to other students.
"We
do want to make sure that parents know just how their children are going, and
parents do want to know how their children are going against the rest of the
class - there's no doubt about that," Ms Macklin said.
"But,
in addition to that, parents want to know whether their children are improving
and how they are going against the standards they are expected to
achieve."
The
chief executive of the Association of Independent Schools of Victoria, Michelle
Green, said deciding what a standard report card should look like or include
would be difficult.
"One
blueprint is going to be very, very hard to establish," Ms Green said. "It's not
quite as simple as mandating the way school reports should be
written."
For
example, she said, many alternative schools such as Steiner and Montessori
schools, and Christian schools were concerned about the "societal message" of
ranking students against their class in reports.
"Some
people deliberately choose a school... where they feel the child will be
stimulated in a lot of ways; but a negative connotation of how a child is
progressing might be provided by a statistical ranking," she
said.
The
Australian Education Union is also against class rankings. The union's Victorian
branch vice-president, Brian Henderson, said students should be measured against
academic standards and not their classmates' performances.